Thursday, March 26, 2026

Dilemma of Modesty in the Face of Equality of Lust

 

My mind has been riddle for days now

and I couldn’t even remember

which note brought this about

and what’s more

 

I couldn’t remember

the logic of the One either,

nor could I any more remember

how I originally knew the One,

 

suddenly cast and trapped

at the bottom of the cave,

trying to remember the path

towards the exit, leading out—

 

And I knew there to be a path,

and yet, the harder I fought

to remember the Way,

the more it seemed to escape me!

 

As if Edgar Poe’s Raven himself

came to perch behind my back

and began to mutter his Nevermore!

That much of my own memory

 

suddenly blanked and gone!

And yet I could still feel it,

in my heart, and the heart

still knows One to be True,

 

but no more can I tell how.

But just now—it came to me:

it was your haiku

on Hexagram 15—

 

but I cannot believe

your haiku poisoned me

(doesn’t poison shear us

from clarities of soul?)—

 

I think it was the note,

the notion of two,

inflicting on me

its own dilemma,

 

the great divider,

the burrowing

and caving riddle

under whose spell

 

helplessly I fell.

Like Nietzsche,

just like Jung.

And so my mind

 

was fazed and fogged

and so was my heart.

Was I drugged

or was I drunk?

 

And the One

shaped into Forms,

I somehow knew—

just out of reach!

 

But then—I did remember

what knocked me out:

in your haiku

about Hexagram 15

 

you called it Modesty—

you warned of the danger

of “falling for equality’s lust.”

But if so, why in Modesty?

 

And you say Jung was seduced

but that he inherited

even that seduction

from Nietzsche.

 

So I tried to read

a bit of Nietzsche,

and there something

caught my eye—

 

seeing his own seeing:

the world as constant flux

and no constant,

unchanging One.


So I went back—

back to the “two”

versus the One.

 

My mind circled and spun.

I tried to remember why and how

the way up and the way down

are one and the same

 

as Heraclitus said.

And going up and down

through the riddle

drove me mad—

 

mad by the seduction

of both Nietzsche’s

and Jung’s delusion

that both Good and evil

 

could (or even should?)

equally coexist—and as lust!

That’s how the poison entered me!

Did I even forget—who I was?

 

After several long walks in the woods,

asking the trees, the sky, the snow,

“WHY can there not be two?”

finally, I let it go

 

and let the question simply be.

Then, this morning, I read

Hexagram 64 and your haiku.

Right at the first reading,

 

that Hexagram felt

as if written for me;

Zeno’s Paradox came

flooding in—

 

Any distance between two things

can be constantly divided into infinity

(whether physical or otherwise),

making it impossible to cross

 

the distance between the two.

So if “both” truly exist,

they must in fact already be One.
Thus, any apparent differences

 

are nothing but illusion.

And if Good and evil both exist, equally,

and we know already that one cannot “cross”

an infinite number of halves between the two

 

(half-goods, half-evils) to arrive

at the other, then in Truth

only one can exist.

The other is simply perversion,

 

misinterpretation, ignorance of the One.
One could certainly choose

(through illusion) to believe

that the only “one” is the evil,

 

unconscious, perhaps even insane,

but then this robotically thrusts

one into a downward spiral

of dark nothingness.

 

How could darkness

be the source of light,

love and joy and soul?
Why do answers

 

(and questions) come

at kairos time—

in their own and right time

as opposed to chronos (or Cronos’) time?

 

Still I don’t know how it was

that I forgot my way—

or was getting lost necessary

to bring me back to where I left off

 

so that I may continue to go

where I ought to be?

Thus I’m finding these days

slow and steady wins the race...


 

No comments:

Post a Comment