Thursday, March 26, 2026

Dilemma of Modesty in the Face of Equality of Lust

 

My mind has been riddle for days now

and I couldn’t even remember

which note brought this about

and what’s more

 

I couldn’t remember

the logic of the One either,

nor could I any more remember

how I originally knew the One,

 

suddenly cast and trapped

at the bottom of the cave,

trying to remember the path

towards the exit, leading out—

 

And I knew there to be a path,

and yet, the harder I fought

to remember the Way,

the more it seemed to escape me!

 

As if Edgar Poe’s Raven himself

came to perch behind my back

and began to mutter his Nevermore!

That much of my own memory

 

suddenly blanked and gone!

And yet I could still feel it,

in my heart, and the heart

still knows One to be True,

 

but no more can I tell how.

But just now—it came to me:

it was your haiku

on Hexagram 15—

 

but I cannot believe

your haiku poisoned me

(doesn’t poison shear us

from clarities of soul?)—

 

I think it was the note,

the notion of two,

inflicting on me

its own dilemma,

 

the great divider,

the burrowing

and caving riddle

under whose spell

 

helplessly I fell.

Like Nietzsche,

just like Jung.

And so my mind

 

was fazed and fogged

and so was my heart.

Was I drugged

or was I drunk?

 

And the One

shaped into Forms,

I somehow knew—

just out of reach!

 

But then—I did remember

what knocked me out:

in your haiku

about Hexagram 15

 

you called it Modesty—

you warned of the danger

of “falling for equality’s lust.”

But if so, why in Modesty?

 

And you say Jung was seduced

but that he inherited

even that seduction

from Nietzsche.

 

So I tried to read

a bit of Nietzsche,

and there something

caught my eye—

 

seeing his own seeing:

the world as constant flux

and no constant,

unchanging One.


So I went back—

back to the “two”

versus the One.

 

My mind circled and spun.

I tried to remember why and how

the way up and the way down

are one and the same

 

as Heraclitus said.

And going up and down

through the riddle

drove me mad—

 

mad by the seduction

of both Nietzsche’s

and Jung’s delusion

that both Good and evil

 

could (or even should?)

equally coexist—and as lust!

That’s how the poison entered me!

Did I even forget—who I was?

 

After several long walks in the woods,

asking the trees, the sky, the snow,

“WHY can there not be two?”

finally, I let it go

 

and let the question simply be.

Then, this morning, I read

Hexagram 64 and your haiku.

Right at the first reading,

 

that Hexagram felt

as if written for me;

Zeno’s Paradox came

flooding in—

 

Any distance between two things

can be constantly divided into infinity

(whether physical or otherwise),

making it impossible to cross

 

the distance between the two.

So if “both” truly exist,

they must in fact already be One.
Thus, any apparent differences

 

are nothing but illusion.

And if Good and evil both exist, equally,

and we know already that one cannot “cross”

an infinite number of halves between the two

 

(half-goods, half-evils) to arrive

at the other, then in Truth

only one can exist.

The other is simply perversion,

 

misinterpretation, ignorance of the One.
One could certainly choose

(through illusion) to believe

that the only “one” is the evil,

 

unconscious, perhaps even insane,

but then this robotically thrusts

one into a downward spiral

of dark nothingness.

 

How could darkness

be the source of light,

love and joy and soul?
Why do answers

 

(and questions) come

at kairos time—

in their own and right time

as opposed to chronos (or Cronos’) time?

 

Still I don’t know how it was

that I forgot my way—

or was getting lost necessary

to bring me back to where I left off

 

so that I may continue to go

where I ought to be?

Thus I’m finding these days

slow and steady wins the race...


 

Friday, March 20, 2026

Vladimir Suchan, Orphean Nostoi, Book II of the Songs before the Gaze, available both in paperback and in e-book

Vladimir Suchan, Orphean Nostoi, Book II of the Songs before the Gaze

 

 

The Xu, the Fruitful Emptiness between Lovers’ Brushstrokes

 

Autumn birds gather into flocks,
and flocks into waves and scarves,
disclosing little, hiding much—

whoever is mortal
commonly strives
for the measure,
straining against it—

but gods—gods alone,
if true—may be at ease,
themselves bearing the measure,
though they did not set it;

and yet both mortals and gods
cannot but admire, deep down,
musicians and poets—those who hone,
their whole lives through, measure’s clear tone,

never turning away from sounding it,
ever seeking to bring it forth—
like the soul’s own pulse,
with the husk removed:

for flower and fruit.

Wednesday, March 4, 2026

Book I of the Songs before the Gaze: Anamnesis and Breath by V. Suchan, published on Amazon as paperback and e-book

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GR2FCTSF 

My new book of poetry Dust of Light is now also available in paperback

 

I Came to This Life to Accord Both with the Sagalassos Missive And Lao Tze’s Teachings


“Men are born soft and supple;
Dead, they are stiff and hard. …
Thus whoever is stiff and inflexible
Is a disciple of death;
Whoever is soft and yielding
Is a disciple of life…
The soft and supple will prevail.”
—Lao Tze, Tao Te Ching, Book 76

Odine, Odette, Undine—
is that a way to transcend
the rigid, leaden corpse
where the light of self,

the good old Atman,
undergoes its darkening?
Not unlike a word in speech—
how did they name it in Urdu?—

when, infused with life,
it grows sinuous and svelte
till it arches to a supple song,
flowing like a mountain spring

ripe and rightly timed
for some restored nymphaeum
(like that above Ağlasun,
where nimble Maenads

ring a hero’s lofty tomb).
And isn’t mater Atman,
mirrored, inverse, dimmed—
a heart petrified within?

Or have we forgotten
that even to be inspired,
there, to begin, one must be
affable to love’s spirit first?

Monday, March 2, 2026

Eternity Returns amid Diverse Loves

 

Amid diverse loves,
eternity returns,
whether moored
or unmoored again.

For what is let go
and what is retained
plumbs and defines
one’s anchor—

what it allows to a sail,
or how well
the Siren sings
on the upright mast,

on that little link
and life’s brief dash
that holds and ties
so much below

and all above.