Saturday, April 4, 2026

I Prefer That Long Beautiful Path And Our Going Together Some Part of It

 

They speak of freedom—but freedom itself
in them is mute. And what do they know
of Rome and the Vatican, since they dress
Lady Liberty in a Roman matron’s gown?

And to whom does such a stern goddess—
an immortal feminine archetype—
meeting her pilgrim at the port,
as Bendis once did Socrates—

pass the twin light of her flaming torch,
if she be no abysmal Gorgon—
one who not only turns her men to swine,
but dissolves them into a loveless void?

Into that void of fatal soullessness
that casts the good and the beautiful
as a recessive dream—
a void that engulfs what one is
or was in ravenous extinction?

And in that gaping hollow, its hostages
are given over to infectious ugliness
that dubs nigredo its elixir and gold,
locking out the ailing rays of truth.

Unless one chooses to resist—
by mastering first the ancient art
of sitting quietly; for thus one learns
how to gather who one is—

and so unlearn not to resist,
nor be swept away by the motions
of the time’s unrelenting windmills
that lift—only to cast their prey

back into the world, coiled in their tail,
where love that once cleared the base
has somehow been forgotten—
though its scent still lingers

in the air like a rose’s breath
from a garden long since gone.
So perhaps an old Sufi saying
may yet offer a slender consolation:

“At every point there are two ways—
the way of strength and the way of weakness.”

And this is the geometry we find on Earth—
though to choose otherwise than the many
marks one an outcast, a pariah,
one who offends against “the holy.”

Yet the soul is the path of all paths,
the song of all songs, and love
of all loves—the golden thread,
the only one leading from the labyrinth,

unknotting all nights and knots,
yet binding the two of us in a filament,
in a great lacing that crisscrosses
lives and deaths.

But how many souls, and how many loves,
would choose that long, beautiful path—
beholden to measure as revelation
in the adoration of the soul’s fresh divine bloom?

Friday, April 3, 2026

Who (and with Whom) May Glimpse Eternal Magnificence of the Whole?

“Invisibly Yours…”

Not answers, but doorways—
and thus, far more.

Not unlike plums and pines
on old Chinese silks—
where each tree: a window,

veiled in silence,
and so smoothed
into a swan-white field,
a page of light spread thin—

or a face that closes
at the touch:

a brief glimpse—deeply pressed,
a passing nearness,

until, brushing
one another’s oneness,

in that single flash
recovered—uncovered—

both in
and out of time.

One Goes, Rain Falls—Reconciled

 

            Oh, where did she shit?

Between Eros and Beauty

and Wisdom and Xu,

the measure of emptiness.

 

Between stillness and the abyss
teeters what is young on toes.
And if it is a girl—
her legs are wrapped

like torching stalks
in floral, throbbing crowns:
how many countless angels
have thus been brought low?

What do mountain rivers know
of where their next bends go,
as they fill deep dykes
over smoothly polished stones?

And there, insight and time
delay their promised hour,
even waiting to be sought—
but who was it who said:

“To unlock wisdom well,
one does not need a heart?”

Or is not kairos another word
for fortitude—

that endures until it is ready
to match the punctilious step
of the Moirai,
and their scale that lifts or dips,

until one learns at last
the way by which
wisdom is wooed?



 

Thursday, March 26, 2026

Dilemma of Modesty in the Face of Equality of Lust

 

My mind has been riddle for days now

and I couldn’t even remember

which note brought this about

and what’s more

 

I couldn’t remember

the logic of the One either,

nor could I any more remember

how I originally knew the One,

 

suddenly cast and trapped

at the bottom of the cave,

trying to remember the path

towards the exit, leading out—

 

And I knew there to be a path,

and yet, the harder I fought

to remember the Way,

the more it seemed to escape me!

 

As if Edgar Poe’s Raven himself

came to perch behind my back

and began to mutter his Nevermore!

That much of my own memory

 

suddenly blanked and gone!

And yet I could still feel it,

in my heart, and the heart

still knows One to be True,

 

but no more can I tell how.

But just now—it came to me:

it was your haiku

on Hexagram 15—

 

but I cannot believe

your haiku poisoned me

(doesn’t poison shear us

from clarities of soul?)—

 

I think it was the note,

the notion of two,

inflicting on me

its own dilemma,

 

the great divider,

the burrowing

and caving riddle

under whose spell

 

helplessly I fell.

Like Nietzsche,

just like Jung.

And so my mind

 

was fazed and fogged

and so was my heart.

Was I drugged

or was I drunk?

 

And the One

shaped into Forms,

I somehow knew—

just out of reach!

 

But then—I did remember

what knocked me out:

in your haiku

about Hexagram 15

 

you called it Modesty—

you warned of the danger

of “falling for equality’s lust.”

But if so, why in Modesty?

 

And you say Jung was seduced

but that he inherited

even that seduction

from Nietzsche.

 

So I tried to read

a bit of Nietzsche,

and there something

caught my eye—

 

seeing his own seeing:

the world as constant flux

and no constant,

unchanging One.


So I went back—

back to the “two”

versus the One.

 

My mind circled and spun.

I tried to remember why and how

the way up and the way down

are one and the same

 

as Heraclitus said.

And going up and down

through the riddle

drove me mad—

 

mad by the seduction

of both Nietzsche’s

and Jung’s delusion

that both Good and evil

 

could (or even should?)

equally coexist—and as lust!

That’s how the poison entered me!

Did I even forget—who I was?

 

After several long walks in the woods,

asking the trees, the sky, the snow,

“WHY can there not be two?”

finally, I let it go

 

and let the question simply be.

Then, this morning, I read

Hexagram 64 and your haiku.

Right at the first reading,

 

that Hexagram felt

as if written for me;

Zeno’s Paradox came

flooding in—

 

Any distance between two things

can be constantly divided into infinity

(whether physical or otherwise),

making it impossible to cross

 

the distance between the two.

So if “both” truly exist,

they must in fact already be One.
Thus, any apparent differences

 

are nothing but illusion.

And if Good and evil both exist, equally,

and we know already that one cannot “cross”

an infinite number of halves between the two

 

(half-goods, half-evils) to arrive

at the other, then in Truth

only one can exist.

The other is simply perversion,

 

misinterpretation, ignorance of the One.
One could certainly choose

(through illusion) to believe

that the only “one” is the evil,

 

unconscious, perhaps even insane,

but then this robotically thrusts

one into a downward spiral

of dark nothingness.

 

How could darkness

be the source of light,

love and joy and soul?
Why do answers

 

(and questions) come

at kairos time—

in their own and right time

as opposed to chronos (or Cronos’) time?

 

Still I don’t know how it was

that I forgot my way—

or was getting lost necessary

to bring me back to where I left off

 

so that I may continue to go

where I ought to be?

Thus I’m finding these days

slow and steady wins the race...


 

Saturday, March 21, 2026

In What We Take for Matter, Seers Found—and Find Still— Abundance of Meaning

 

O soft suspension—beyond
the street-screens of noise,
beyond the whirling dust—
there—is it still

poetry and love,
radiant, revealed—
a painting made of breath,
gladly at rest in a gentle glide?

How could anyone
who has once tasted
this strange, other
pomegranate

ever run out
of bedded notes—
but, in rapture, return
to who one always was?